Initial Question:
In the practice of loving-kindness, what is the
beautiful and what is the culmination of this practice?
Answer:
You brought up a good question about "Loving-kindness"
practice and where it culminates. Your question was, what is the
beautiful?
The "Beautiful" is equivalent to the Fourth jhana and
the practice of the Brahma Viharas or Breaking down the Barriers" does
lead onward nearly to the full liberation: Nibbana.
It is long overdue for me to do another examination of
this sutta in a little more detail than done before. So this is a good
time to do this. Why don’t we go over it from the beginning to find out
exactly how far one can go while practicing Loving-kindness meditation.
OK?
We’ll use the text translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi from
"The connected Discourses of the Buddha, a translation of the Samyutta
Nikaya" published by Wisdom Publications. Sometime I would suggest you
get this book so we can work on things together in the future. It is
available at Amazon.com .
The text for this begins on page 1607. It is found in
The Great Book (Mahavagga) Chapter II 46 Bojangasamyutta; Connected
Discourses of Enlightenment- in V The Discussions- Sutta # 54 (4)
Accompanied by Loving-kindness.
On one occasion the Blessed One was dwelling among the
Koliyans, where there was a town of the Koliyans named Haliddavasan.
Then, in the morning, a number of monks dressed and, taking their bowls
and robes, entered Haliddavasana for alms. Then it occurred to them: "It
is still too early to walk for alms in Haliddavasana. Let us go to the
park of the wanderers of other sects."
Then those monks went to the park of the wanderers of
other sects. They exchanged greetings with those wanderers and, when
they had concluded their greetings and cordial talk, sat down to one
side. The wanderers then said to them: "Friends, the ascetic Gotama
teaches the Dhamma to this disciples thus: ‘Come, monks, abandon the
five hindrances, the corruptions of the mind that weaken wisdom, and
dwell pervading one quarter with mind imbued with Loving Kindness,
likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter, and the fourth
quarter. Thus above, below, across and everywhere, and to all as to
oneself, dwell pervading the entire world with a mind imbued with loving
kindness, vast, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill
will. Dwell pervading one quarter of the mind with Compassion,
likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter, and the fourth
quarter. Thus above, below, across and everywhere, and to all as to
oneself, dwell pervading the entire world with a mind imbued with loving
kindness, vast, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without ill
will. Dwell pervading one quarter of the mind with Altruistic
Joy, likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter, and
the fourth quarter. Thus above, below, across and everywhere, and to all
as to oneself, dwell pervading the entire world with a mind imbued with
loving kindness, vast, exalted, measureless, without hostility, without
ill will. Dwell pervading one quarter of the mind with
Equanimity, likewise the second quarter, likewise the third quarter,
and the fourth quarter. Thus above, below, across and everywhere, and to
all as to oneself, dwell pervading the entire world with a mind imbued
with loving kindness, vast, exalted, measureless, without hostility,
without ill will.’
"We too, friends, teach the Dhamma to our disciples
thus: ‘ Come, friends, abandon the five hindrances, [ them repeat the
same over again.]’ So, friends, what here is the distinction, the
disparity, the difference between the ascetic Gotama and us, that is,
regarding the one Dhamma teaching and the other, regarding the one
manner of instruction and the other?
These others are asking about the Buddha’s teaching of
what is called the "Brahma Viharas" which are composed of four parts
mainly Loving-kindness, Compassion, Altruistic Joy, and Equanimity. This
is really a good question about ‘what in the world is the Buddha doing
that other practices were not doing’ at the time he was teaching?
Those monks neither delighted in nor rejected the
statement of those wanders. Without delighting in it, without rejecting
it, they rose from their seats and left, thinking, "We shall learn the
meaning of this statement in the presence of the Blessed One."
Here these monks went directly to the Buddha to ask
him firsthand what is the difference in the way he is teaching so they
would be able to explain in future times to others! They took their alms
bowls back to where they ate and had their meal and probably rested for
good digestion and then afterwards, they went to find the Buddha. They
told him the entire story of what had taken place and asked him to make
a clear reply. At the top of page 1609 it continues on and I will break
it down a little bit so you can see it more clearly:
"Monks, when wanderers of other sects speak thus, they
should be asked: ‘Friends, how is the liberation of the mind by
loving-kindness developed? What does it have as its destination, its
culmination, its fruit, its final goal?
How is the liberation of the mind by compassion
developed? What does it have as its destination, its culmination, its
fruit, its final goal?
How is the liberation of the mind by joy
developed? What does it have as its destination, its culmination, its
fruit, its final goal?
How is the liberation of the mind by equanimity
developed? What does it have as its destination, its culmination, its
fruit, its final goal?
Being asked thus, those wanderers would not be able to
reply and , further, they would meet with vexation. For what reason?
Because that would not be within their domain. I do
not see anyone, monks, in this world with its devas, Mara, and Brahma,
in this generation with its ascetics and Brahmins, its devas and humans,
who could satisfy the mind with an answer to these questions except the
Tathagata or a disciple of the Tathagata or one who has heard it from
them.
Now here we are with the Buddha and he is letting
these monks know that the answer to these questions does not lie in
those other traditions. [ in other words all meditation is NOT the same
and all jhana is NOT the same]. They do not have the answers for these
questions. Knowing the Buddha, through other sutta texts and stories,
and how curious and investigative he was by nature during his six year
search when he was yet a bodisatta, one can pretty well figure that he
tried those other traditions before saying this. As we are told in these
stories, he had tried those traditions and it just wasn’t there that the
answer lies. He continued his search for the way to liberation from the
suffering and to fully understand many other things along the way.
You know, this is where Faith comes into the picture
in Buddhism. The Faith is that faith we put in him that he was telling
the truth and you and I do not have to go through what he went through
to figure this out if we just follow his instructions without changing
them. But many, many people don’t have this faith and instead, they jump
all over the place trying to figure things out going tradition to
tradition struggling with political correctness and any number of other
things and no one seems to want to go right to the source any more and
just do what the guy said to do! I don’t know about you, but I feel
pretty safe in saying that if someone found something and then taught it
for 45 years and left a heap of instructions, then we should examine
those first and not what someone later said they mean and most
especially when no one can tell you where the arahats are?
That was one of my issues in the beginning. So.
Americans have been doing this Buddhism for over 50 years now and so,
where are the arahats? It says right here in the scriptures that this
practice he did was easily accessible, easy to do all the time, with
benefits and results that happen right away in our lives. And he
described those results that should be happening in many places in the
suttas. So why would you go to a book about meditation that doesn’t do
that? That isn’t readily accessible, that doesn’t being immediate
results etc? Over time I discovered that people were just not going to
the right source. It’s still here, available, with immediate benefits
and results. You gotta know where it is AND you gotta know HOW to test
it and examine it for yourself.
BTW- The thing that springs up for us here in this
sutta is that the Buddha is using the 4 Noble Truths once again as a
tool for his investigation training if you look closely. We are shown
here how the 4 Noble Truths, all of them or a part of them, are a viable
pattern of investigation to follow in order to figure things out! The
questions here for instance,
What is Loving-kindness? What is Compassion? What is
Altruistic Joy? What is Equanimity? These demonstrate the First Noble
Truth being used just like with "What is Suffering?"
Then we are examining within our practice What is the
Cause of Loving-kindness, Compassion, Joy, Equanimity?
By practicing Loving-kindness we come to experience
the cessation of formations and this is the Third Noble Truth
Last the Buddha talks about the path talking about the
arising Factors of Enlightenment with each of the Brahma Viharas and
then the point of culmination as you go down the path using this method
of meditation which is the Fourth noble Truth.
Then the Buddha moves on to precisely examining the
destination of, the culmination, of the fruit of, and the final goal of
these states.
So he is demonstrating the "uninterrupted practice "
that must take place during this investigation to find this out. This is
why we do retreats for this very deep level of meditation work.
As he starts in with the good stuff, the Buddha gets
down to explaining the destination, the culmination, the fruit, and the
final goal of each of the four stages of breaking down the barriers on
the way to Nibbana, or, practicing the Brahma Viharas.
And how, monks, is the liberation of the mind by
loving kindness developed? What does it have as its destination, its
culmination, and its final goal? Here, monks, a monk develops the
enlightenment factor of mindfulness accompanied by loving-kindness,
…[the enlightenment factor of investigation accompanied by
Loving-kindness, the enlightenment factor of energy accompanied by
loving-kindness, the enlightenment factor of JOY accompanied by
loving-kindness, the enlightenment factor of Tranquility accompanied by
loving-kindness, the enlightenment factor of concentration
[collectedness] accompanied by loving-kindness, and the factor of
equanimity accompanied by loving-kindness, based upon seclusion,
dispassion, and cessation, maturing in release.
Here we are told that in order to reach the ultimate
liberation we have to experience the enlightenment factors. The Buddha
is telling us that if we practice loving-kindness we will experience
these factors.
Now it is obvious here that this is not a short thing
to do! To do this the Noble ones went into seclusion, meaning
that to a location in the forest where they could be in sequestered
retreat alone only getting food and no other activity than meditation.
They did not go out of the area for the phone. Nor did they go to the
library, of which there were none, to do research and think. They did
not move from place to place or communicate with anyone while doing this
precise in depth work of meditation other than for the logistics of
supporting each others living there.
Isn't the SECLUSION here the type of seclusion you
practice in the midst of all the distractions and not necessarily
physical seclusion?
Yes. Now this would be true. But at the time within
the Banyan tree a monk would sit alone and would be as secluded as
possible from all disturbances to do this work….
They practiced with a dispassionate attitude
towards everything. What do I mean? Well, for instance, all food was
considered "energy" that would sustain them to continue their practice.
There was not choose a cuisine but rather they accepted whatever they
were given. They relinquished ‘making decisions about anything’ and
mixed the food together in a bowl and ate it at the appointed time each
day. Then they continued their meditation. They neither reached for or
pushed away any arising phenomenon they experienced at any of their
sense doors. They simply let it be, let everything fall away. They did
not Crave anything because they were practicing how to let it go. They
practiced ceasing of as much Clinging as possible with an impersonal
perspective on everything.
Is this the CESSATION? Why wouldn't it be cessation of
craving?
Actually this is the level where habitual tendency to
crave has been greatly reduced. To live like this is a steady practice
not to submit to the tendency of "I" like or "I" don’t like. This is
where the training leads.
[ if you do not Crave, you would not cling they were
gradually discovering] They let go of anything arising. They recognized
any thought arising and abandoned [released] it and each time this
occurred, they relaxed ALL tension in the body and the mind, smiling
lightly, returning to their object of meditation and continuing on
again. Sound familiar?.
Yes it is familiar - but where in this sutta
does it say that?
All suttas don’t say
everything. The error is to take one sutta and believe it alone is the
answer. The monks who were listening to this discussion were speaking on
particular points here. They had already integrated the 6 R’s we are
learning completely and this talk as about how far one can go using the
Brahma Viharas.
The had relinquished their possessions and here
pursued the meditation, ardent and resolute on Loving-kindness to see
what happened next! They encouraged each other as they went along too.
Obviously this was done over a period of time. This is
why the monks and nuns seeked the Noble Supramundane Path, totally
committed and doing this all the time. Lay persons found much relief
learning to do the practice, using it in their lives all the time, and
finding a large degree of relief. Remember too, at that time they were
not reading and thinking the way we do today. They did this practice and
that’s how they figured things out through personal experience.
The Buddha goes on here to explain how the monk
mediated,
If he wishes, ‘May I dwell perceiving the
unrespulsive in the repulsive,’ he dwells perceiving the unrepulsive
therein. If he wishes: ‘May I dwell perceiving the repulsive in the
unrepulsive and in the repulsive,’ he dwells perceiving the repulsive
therein. If he wishes: ‘May I dwell perceiving the unrepulsive in the
repulsive and in the unrepulsive, ‘ he dwells perceiving the repulsive
therein. If he wishes:’ May I dwell perceiving the unrepulsive in the
repulsive and in the unrepulsive,’ he dwells perceiving the unrepulsive
therein. If he wishes: ‘Avoiding both the unrepulsive and the repulsive,
may I dwell equanimously, mindful and clearly comprehending,’ then he
dwells therein equanimously, mindful and clearly comprehending.
In this sutta, one gets a clear picture of the
meticulous investigative work the monk is doing in the meditation as he
goes along. He may spend a day on each part of the above until he is at
ease with it entirely within the frame of Loving-kindness before moving
on to the nest phase. He is experimenting with the dispassion of it all
the entire time noticing how he was hooked before by so much attachment
and aversion.
It continues on:
Or else he enters and dwells in the deliverance of the
beautiful. Monks, the liberation of mind by loving-kindness has the
beautiful as its culmination, I say, for a wise monk here who has been
penetrated to a superior liberation.
There is a commentarial opinion that goes to great
lengths to explain that the ‘beautiful’ here means that the monk now
uses a kasina in order to jump into the formless states but the sutta
doesn’t talk about this at all and one can suspect the writer didn’t do
the exercise himself to see what happens but rather assumed. If you
practice yourself and check this out doing the meditation, following the
instructions precisely as you have heard them in the Satipatthana sutta
and the Anapanasati sutta but applied to the Loving-kindness meditation,
you are likely to realize that the loving-kindness will carry you
through the ‘aware’ jhanas as the Buddha was practicing very deeply. He
was not talking about Absorption here.
The sutta goes on here:
"And how, monks, is the liberation of the mind by
compassion developed? What does it have as its destination, its
culmination, its fruit, its final goal? Here, monks, a monk develops the
enlightenment factor of mindfulness accompanied by compassion…the
enlightenment factor of equanimity accompanied by compassion, based on
seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, maturing in release. If he wishes:
‘May I dwell percieivng the repulsive in the unrepulsive,’ he dwells
perceiving the repulsive therein… If he wishes:’ Avoiding both the
unrepulsive and the repulsive, may I dwell equanimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending.’ Then he dwells therein equnimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending. Or else, with the complete transcendence of
perceptions of forms, with the passing away of perceptions of sensory
impingement, with nonattention to perceptions of diversity, aware that
‘space is infinite,’ he enters and dwells in the base of infinity of
space. Monks, the liberation of mind by compassion has the base of
infinity of space as it’s culmination, I say, for a wise monk here who
has not penetrates to a superior liberation.
Any words on how the equanimity of the Brahma Viharas
is related and different from the enlightenment factor of equanimity?
This sutta sits in the
Connected Discourses on the Factors of enlightenment and this IS that
level of "Equanimity". Yes.
To this point, we are being told that Loving-kindness
goes to the Fourth Jhana which has very strong Equanimity. Then we see
Compassion go into Infinite Space.
"And how, monks, is the liberation of the mind by
Altruistic Joy developed? What does it have as its destination, its
culmination, its fruit, its final goal? Here, monks, a monk develops the
enlightenment factor of mindfulness accompanied by Altruistic Joy…the
enlightenment factor of equanimity accompanied by Altruistic Joy, based
on seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, maturing in release. If he
wishes: ‘May I dwell perceiving the repulsive in the unrepulsive,’ he
dwells perceiving the repulsive therein… If he wishes:’ Avoiding both
the unrepulsive and the repulsive, may I dwell equanimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending.’ Then he dwells therein equanimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending. Or else, by completely transcending the base of
infinity, aware that consciousness is infinite,’ he enters and dwells in
the base of the infinity of consciousness. Monks, the liberation of mind
by Altruistic Joy has the base of the infinity of consciousness as it’s
culmination, I say, for a wise monk here who has not penetrated to a
superior liberation.
What is superior liberation?
Superior Liberation would
be that liberation that is permanent and does not slip ! such liberation
has reached a level of automatic Release without any more volition about
it ! AND the unwholesome ceases arising altogether too.
Here we see Altruistic Joy go as far as the base of
the infinity of consciousness as its culmination. This should not be
believed but tested! Try it. You’ll see for yourself. It will be shown
by personal investigation to be true.
You tempt me! This seems a natural to me since I have
long thought and advocated a "middle road" in reacting to events - in
delightful happenings to consider the downside and not get over elated
and in tragic events to see the "silver lining" - to be equanimous to
everything - tho I didn't use that wording. Are you actually recommending this? The meditation practice seems quite
different in detail from the instructions in loving kindness meditation
as presented by Bhante. - Can both methods be done together?
There is no difference.
This is only a graduated level of the same meditation. Upon reaching the
Arupa jhana ( Immaterial Jhanas) one continues on but the activity of
anything arising is occurring at the microscopic level now, almost not
at all.
"And how, monks, is the liberation of the mind by
Equanimity developed? What does it have as its destination, its
culmination, its fruit, its final goal? Here, monks, a monk develops the
enlightenment factor of mindfulness accompanied by Equanimity…the
enlightenment factor of equanimity accompanied by Equanimity, based on
seclusion, dispassion, and cessation, maturing in release. If he wishes:
‘May I dwell percieivng the repulsive in the unrepulsive,’ he dwells
perceiving the repulsive therein… If he wishes:’ Avoiding both the
unrepulsive and the repulsive, may I dwell equanimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending.’ Then he dwells therein equanimously, mindful and
clearly comprehending. Or else, by completely transcending the base of
the infinity of consciousness, aware that there is nothing,’ he enters
and dwells in the base of nothingness. Monks, the liberation of mind by
Equanimity has the base of nothingness as it’s culmination, I say, for a
wise monk here who has not penetrates to a superior liberation.
End sutta text.
So there you have it. How far can Loving-kindness and
the practice of the Brahma Viharas go? It culminates at the point of as
far as the "base of nothingness"! Many people don’t know this. Many
never look into a whole sutta or if they do and they have the wrong
working definitions for mindfulness and meditation, they won’t
understand what they are reading. Understanding how far the Brahma
Viharas go another thing becomes clear. The practice of loving-kindness
is not a practice to be isolated or to be put into shortform and used
bang, bang, bang! This practice, which was mentioned many more times
than the breath meditation, led very far along the path to Nibbana, was
meant to be embraced and used all the time and for good for all
situations. It is VERY powerful tool for helping ourselves and helping
others physically and mentally.
From the base of nothingness, one can then enter into
the state of Neither perception nor non-perception, then on to No
feeling and No perception which is called Nirodha Samapada. At that
point one can experience ‘the taints being destroyed by seeing with
wisdom’ which means seeing clearly the impersonal process of dependent
origination forwards and in the reverse order very clearly: Nibbana.
Some differences here.
Obviously presenting the practice of loving-kindness
in this way is not the norm today. You are not likely to find any books
anywhere but the suttas that preserve this information. People tend to
present it in a very fast progression without explanation of the power
that people can develop by practicing this way You may say, well,, that
doesn’t make sense. And I would have to say, well, that’s the way of it
right now.
With a resolute gradual approach, this practice is a
progression of power which is developed as one goes along. Each time the
practitioner is examining the ‘repulsive or non-repulsive ‘etc. that is
a way of testing the stableness of the equanimity within that level
before moving on to the next level.
The different states here are where the practitioner
experiences a change in the feeling of the practice they are doing.
For instance, at the point where a yogi is practicing
loving-kindness and they reach the fourth jhana, they will feel a
significant shift as they come to the base of infinite space. It will
feel different and they will explain to the guiding teacher and this
change indicates to the teacher that the student should now move on to
the Compassion phase of the practice. It’s like that. It’s a progression
you go through and the power is getting stronger and stronger all the
time.
By presenting a very fast presentation of the brahma
viharas or this set of meditation phases and without explanation, the
student doesn’t’ get the full picture of the power of what they are
learning, the good they can do with it, OR the level of attainment they
can progress to by doing this practice. It isn’t clear. I have witnessed
this. It’s a shame this has been diluted down to the level it has been.
But at the same time, it is understandable how, if the teacher has put
their faith in a commentarial work to explain what this practice is,
rather than going to ask directly in the suttas, this is what happens.
Although it sounds good, it disagrees with the sutta texts when it comes
to meditation and it short changes the student badly..
So to answer the original question the ‘beautiful’ is
at the level of strong, firm Equanimity which is the condition of the
state of the Fourth Jhana and this is where the loving-kindness changes.
The feeling shifts. When it shifts it is a sign to move on with the
Compassion work to be done. I will not tell you how it shifts. You must
come to the teacher and tell him so he will know when to guide you to
the next step and so on.
Hope this helps you to understand a little better.
It was a good exercise to do this too so I can learn
how to explain it more clearly.
Could still use some shortening up but it’s a start,
anyway.
Much Metta.
Khanti-Khema
Dhamma Sukha Meditation Center.
Annapolis, MO
March 26th- 2006